Published on Write a comment

CO2 per capita limit - because it can't go on like this ...

The introduction of a CO2 per capita limit would be a sensible, comprehensive measure to tackle the climate crisis. We have to live more consciously. Because our uninhibited consumption and the consequences for the planet, let us race towards a catastrophe.

We at hundsfutter With everything we do, we always focus on one topic: sustainability. Sustainability means future. And having a future is a prerequisite for enjoying life in the here and now. In principle, this is clear to everyone. We discuss it a lot, but we simply don't do enough. We would have many options to contribute immediatelyn. Here are the federal government's ideas on the subject. It is a very complicated topic because nobody wants to start without something. And of course nobody wants to be in front of them voter and announce to them that we have to slow down in our consumption and growth frenzy.

Everyone has the same right to unspoiled nature.

A suggestion would be if we stipulate that each person can only produce a certain amount of CO2. So simply a per capita CO2 limit. This is actually the fairest way to view the content of the constitution to implement. The constitution, which applies to everyone, grants everyone the right to an intact nature.

A per capita CO2 limit does not mean that you cannot participate in modern life.

All people want and should also participate in modern life with its great achievements. But everyone should only get so much that no other person is denied the right to unspoiled nature.

So we divide life, air and nature fairly. Everyone gets the same share.

We live in a free society and everyone can decide for themselves what they do and what is important for them. Our proposal to organize freedom and justice would be to set a maximum amount of CO2 per capita. Per capita per year. The amount will be the same for everyone, because the air belongs to everyone equally. So if you find it important to go on a cruise and prefer to travel by plane, then you will probably have to drive a bus in everyday life so as not to exceed your CO2 emissions limit.

However, if he did vegan lives, he may be able to save so much CO2 that maybe a low-carbon car is inside. Because everyone has the same right to life and EVERYONE owns the basis of life such as water, air and nature. A CO2 per capita limit is the only way to a future worth living.

This regulation is wonderfully just and everyone is free to live out. But it is no longer possible for some to make use of the world that belongs to everyone in an unsolidated and excessive manner.

Another example: who with Virgin flies to the moon, then has to heat very sparingly in winter in the following years because there is simply no CO2 reserve left.

Those who put a particular strain on the world with an activity naturally have the chance to compensate for this by saving CO2 elsewhere. So if our cosmonaut vegan lives, there could still be a CO2 reserve for cozy warmth in winter.

As long as people do not voluntarily divide up their consumption of air and consume more than they are entitled to, a CO2 per capita limit can only guarantee our survival by law.

Anyone who finds this drastic must imagine what it must be like for those who have to balance the praising of others. Many people will livelihood destroyed by the fact that there are people who simply take too much of what belongs to everyone. Many people have to flee their countries because life there has become impossible.

We Germans produce 7 times as much CO2 per year as is compatible with the world.

And if you still find it drastic, you should remember that we Germans produce 7 times as much CO2 per year as is compatible with the world. On average, all people emit twice as much CO2 as the world can compensate for. So we consume our world very quickly. And the better we are, that is, the more we participate in the convenience of the consumer world, the more CO2 goes into our account. Only one CO2 limit per person can help society understand what is happening.

Everything is incredibly sad, because people have children and at the same time destroy their future.

One would actually expect such sophisticated beings to be more pronounced Sense of responsibility should have and no CO2 per capita limit would be necessary. That's why we have to start rethinking immediately and make sure that when we consume, we Low CO2 products choose and use energy sparingly. We can only make it if everyone joins in. It is also important that people who want to invest don't just hope for a quick buck, but also select sustainable projects here. Just like when consuming. It's the same in small. We have to direct the money to where it is handled responsibly. Wherever you invest in sustainability and it's not just about maximizing profits.

Leave a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * marked